ログイン

finals
35問 • 5ヶ月前
  • Adrian Ramirez
  • 通報

    問題一覧

  • 1

    It is a rule which states that the rights of a party cannot be prejudiced by an act, declaration, or omission of another, except as otherwise provided.

    RES INTER ALIOS ACTA RULE

  • 2

    It refers to an act or declaration of a partner or agent of the party, within the scope of his authority and during the existence of the partnership or agency, which may be given in evidence against such party.

    ADMISSION BY CO-PARTNER OR AGENT

  • 3

    It refers to an act or declaration of a conspirator relating to the conspiracy and during its existence, which may be given in evidence against the co-conspirator.

    ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR

  • 4

    It is an act, declaration, or omission by a predecessor-in-interest, made while holding the title to property, which may be given in evidence against the successor-in-interest.

    ADMISSION BY PRIVIES

  • 5

    It happens when a party does or says nothing in the presence of an act or declaration that naturally calls for a denial or response if not true.

    ADMISSION BY SILENCE

  • 6

    It is a voluntary acknowledgement made by a party of the existence of the truth of certain facts which are inconsistent with his claims in an action

    ADMISSION

  • 7

    The declaration of an accused acknowledging his guilt of the offense charged, or of any offense necessarily included therein, may be given in evidence against him.

    CONFESSION

  • 8

    It is the rule that evidence of a person’s conduct at one time is not admissible to prove that he did or did not do the same at another time, except to show intent, knowledge, identity, plan, system, scheme, habit, or custom.

    RES INTER ALIOS ACTA RULE

  • 9

    It refers to an offer in writing to pay a certain sum of money or deliver property which, if rejected without valid cause, is considered equivalent to actual tender of payment or delivery.

    UNACCEPTED OFFER

  • 10

    A witness can testify only to those facts which he knows of his personal knowledge; that is, which are derived from his own perception, except as otherwise provided in these rules.

    HEARSAY RULE

  • 11

    This type of evidence is based on the personal knowledge, skill, training, or experience of the witness, forming conclusions from what they personally observed

    OPINION EVIDENCE

  • 12

    One that is not based on one’s personal perception but based on the knowledge of others to prove the truth of the matter asserted in an out-of-court declaration

    HEARSAY EVIDENCE

  • 13

    A statement made by a person under the consciousness of impending death, referring to the cause and circumstances of his death, which may be received in evidence.

    DYING DECLARATION

  • 14

    It is the declaration made by a deceased person, or one unable to testify, against his own interest at the time it was made, such that a reasonable person would not have made it unless he believed it true.

    DECLARATION AGAINST INTEREST

  • 15

    is the duty of a party to present evidence on the facts in issue necessary to establish his claim or defense by the amount of evidence required by law.

    BURDEN OF PROOF

  • 16

    It is the duty of a party to go forward with the evidence to overthrow the prima facie evidence against him. This may shift from one side to the other as the exigencies of the trial require, and shifts with alternating frequency.

    BURDEN OF EVIDENCE

  • 17

    an assumption of fact resulting from a rule of law which requires such fact to be assumed from another fact or group of facts found or otherwise established;

    PRESUMPTION

  • 18

    a factual conclusion that can rationally be draw from other facts

    INFERENCE

  • 19

    an assumption which the law requires to be made from a set of facts

    PRESUMPTION OF LAW

  • 20

    an assumption made from facts without any direction or positive requirement of a law.

    PRESUMPTION OF FACTS

  • 21

    a presumption which becomes irrebuttable upon the presentation of the evidence and any evidence tending to rebut the presumption is not admissible

    CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION

  • 22

    a presumption which may be contradicted or overcome by other evidence; it is satisfactory if uncontradicted

    DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTION

  • 23

    an equitable principle rooted upon natural justice which prevents persons from going back on their own acts and representations, to the prejudice of others who have relied on them.

    ESTOPPEL

  • 24

    What rule provides that there is no presumption of legitimacy of a child born after three hundred (300) days following the dissolution of the marriage or the separation of the spouses, and that whoever alleges legitimacy or illegitimacy must prove his allegation?

    PRESUMPTION OF LEGITIMACY AND ILLEGITIMACY

  • 25

    is the examination-in-chief of a witness by the party presenting him on the facts relevant to the issue.

    DIRECT EXAMINATION

  • 26

    It is the questioning of a witness by the adverse party after the direct examination, intended to test the accuracy, truthfulness, or bias of the witness.

    CROSS EXAMINATION

  • 27

    It is the examination conducted by the party who presented the witness, after cross-examination, to explain or supplement the answers of the witness.

    RE-DIRECT EXAMINATION

  • 28

    It is the examination by the adverse party after the re-direct examination, limited to matters raised in the re-direct or as allowed by the court.

    RE-CROSS EXAMINATION

  • 29

    It is the act of calling a witness to the stand again after both sides have finished examining him, which can only be done with the permission of the court.

    RECALLING WITNESS

  • 30

    It is a type of question that suggests to the witness the answer which the examining party desires.

    LEADING QUESTION

  • 31

    It is a question that assumes as true a fact not yet testified to by the witness, or contrary to what the witness has previously stated.

    MISLEADING QUESTION

  • 32

    one directed against the alleged defect in the formulation of the question

    FORMAL OBJECTION

  • 33

    one made and directed against the very nature of the evidence

    SUBSTANTIVE OBJECTION

  • 34

    It is the act of attaching documents or things that the court excluded as evidence, so that they form part of the case record.

    TENDER OF EXCLUDED EVIDENCE

  • 35

    It is the legal term used to describe the process of making sure that excluded evidence is still placed on record for possible review on appeal.

    OFFER OF PROOF

  • CLJ1 FINALS

    CLJ1 FINALS

    Adrian Ramirez · 95問 · 2年前

    CLJ1 FINALS

    CLJ1 FINALS

    95問 • 2年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    theories of crime causation

    theories of crime causation

    Adrian Ramirez · 24問 · 1年前

    theories of crime causation

    theories of crime causation

    24問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    theories of crime causation

    theories of crime causation

    Adrian Ramirez · 43問 · 1年前

    theories of crime causation

    theories of crime causation

    43問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    THEORIES OF CRIME CAUSATION 2

    THEORIES OF CRIME CAUSATION 2

    Adrian Ramirez · 7問 · 1年前

    THEORIES OF CRIME CAUSATION 2

    THEORIES OF CRIME CAUSATION 2

    7問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI 1

    CDI 1

    Adrian Ramirez · 70問 · 1年前

    CDI 1

    CDI 1

    70問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    cdi (2nd)

    cdi (2nd)

    Adrian Ramirez · 65問 · 1年前

    cdi (2nd)

    cdi (2nd)

    65問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    theories of crime causation (2nd quiz)

    theories of crime causation (2nd quiz)

    Adrian Ramirez · 41問 · 1年前

    theories of crime causation (2nd quiz)

    theories of crime causation (2nd quiz)

    41問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI 1 QUIZ 3

    CDI 1 QUIZ 3

    Adrian Ramirez · 92問 · 1年前

    CDI 1 QUIZ 3

    CDI 1 QUIZ 3

    92問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI CHAPTER 6

    CDI CHAPTER 6

    Adrian Ramirez · 100問 · 1年前

    CDI CHAPTER 6

    CDI CHAPTER 6

    100問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI CHAPTER 6 (2)

    CDI CHAPTER 6 (2)

    Adrian Ramirez · 48問 · 1年前

    CDI CHAPTER 6 (2)

    CDI CHAPTER 6 (2)

    48問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI CHAPTER 7

    CDI CHAPTER 7

    Adrian Ramirez · 60問 · 1年前

    CDI CHAPTER 7

    CDI CHAPTER 7

    60問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI CHAPTPER 8

    CDI CHAPTPER 8

    Adrian Ramirez · 26問 · 1年前

    CDI CHAPTPER 8

    CDI CHAPTPER 8

    26問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI chapter 9

    CDI chapter 9

    Adrian Ramirez · 14問 · 1年前

    CDI chapter 9

    CDI chapter 9

    14問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI CHAPTER 10-11

    CDI CHAPTER 10-11

    Adrian Ramirez · 41問 · 1年前

    CDI CHAPTER 10-11

    CDI CHAPTER 10-11

    41問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    LEA 1 (1st quiz)

    LEA 1 (1st quiz)

    Adrian Ramirez · 15問 · 1年前

    LEA 1 (1st quiz)

    LEA 1 (1st quiz)

    15問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    CDI 2 CHAPTER 1-2

    CDI 2 CHAPTER 1-2

    Adrian Ramirez · 49問 · 1年前

    CDI 2 CHAPTER 1-2

    CDI 2 CHAPTER 1-2

    49問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    forensic photography (chapter 1)

    forensic photography (chapter 1)

    Adrian Ramirez · 31問 · 1年前

    forensic photography (chapter 1)

    forensic photography (chapter 1)

    31問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    Forensic Photography quiz 2

    Forensic Photography quiz 2

    Adrian Ramirez · 71問 · 1年前

    Forensic Photography quiz 2

    Forensic Photography quiz 2

    71問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    Lea 1 3rd quiz

    Lea 1 3rd quiz

    Adrian Ramirez · 43問 · 1年前

    Lea 1 3rd quiz

    Lea 1 3rd quiz

    43問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    LEA 1 ORAL

    LEA 1 ORAL

    Adrian Ramirez · 42問 · 1年前

    LEA 1 ORAL

    LEA 1 ORAL

    42問 • 1年前
    Adrian Ramirez

    問題一覧

  • 1

    It is a rule which states that the rights of a party cannot be prejudiced by an act, declaration, or omission of another, except as otherwise provided.

    RES INTER ALIOS ACTA RULE

  • 2

    It refers to an act or declaration of a partner or agent of the party, within the scope of his authority and during the existence of the partnership or agency, which may be given in evidence against such party.

    ADMISSION BY CO-PARTNER OR AGENT

  • 3

    It refers to an act or declaration of a conspirator relating to the conspiracy and during its existence, which may be given in evidence against the co-conspirator.

    ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR

  • 4

    It is an act, declaration, or omission by a predecessor-in-interest, made while holding the title to property, which may be given in evidence against the successor-in-interest.

    ADMISSION BY PRIVIES

  • 5

    It happens when a party does or says nothing in the presence of an act or declaration that naturally calls for a denial or response if not true.

    ADMISSION BY SILENCE

  • 6

    It is a voluntary acknowledgement made by a party of the existence of the truth of certain facts which are inconsistent with his claims in an action

    ADMISSION

  • 7

    The declaration of an accused acknowledging his guilt of the offense charged, or of any offense necessarily included therein, may be given in evidence against him.

    CONFESSION

  • 8

    It is the rule that evidence of a person’s conduct at one time is not admissible to prove that he did or did not do the same at another time, except to show intent, knowledge, identity, plan, system, scheme, habit, or custom.

    RES INTER ALIOS ACTA RULE

  • 9

    It refers to an offer in writing to pay a certain sum of money or deliver property which, if rejected without valid cause, is considered equivalent to actual tender of payment or delivery.

    UNACCEPTED OFFER

  • 10

    A witness can testify only to those facts which he knows of his personal knowledge; that is, which are derived from his own perception, except as otherwise provided in these rules.

    HEARSAY RULE

  • 11

    This type of evidence is based on the personal knowledge, skill, training, or experience of the witness, forming conclusions from what they personally observed

    OPINION EVIDENCE

  • 12

    One that is not based on one’s personal perception but based on the knowledge of others to prove the truth of the matter asserted in an out-of-court declaration

    HEARSAY EVIDENCE

  • 13

    A statement made by a person under the consciousness of impending death, referring to the cause and circumstances of his death, which may be received in evidence.

    DYING DECLARATION

  • 14

    It is the declaration made by a deceased person, or one unable to testify, against his own interest at the time it was made, such that a reasonable person would not have made it unless he believed it true.

    DECLARATION AGAINST INTEREST

  • 15

    is the duty of a party to present evidence on the facts in issue necessary to establish his claim or defense by the amount of evidence required by law.

    BURDEN OF PROOF

  • 16

    It is the duty of a party to go forward with the evidence to overthrow the prima facie evidence against him. This may shift from one side to the other as the exigencies of the trial require, and shifts with alternating frequency.

    BURDEN OF EVIDENCE

  • 17

    an assumption of fact resulting from a rule of law which requires such fact to be assumed from another fact or group of facts found or otherwise established;

    PRESUMPTION

  • 18

    a factual conclusion that can rationally be draw from other facts

    INFERENCE

  • 19

    an assumption which the law requires to be made from a set of facts

    PRESUMPTION OF LAW

  • 20

    an assumption made from facts without any direction or positive requirement of a law.

    PRESUMPTION OF FACTS

  • 21

    a presumption which becomes irrebuttable upon the presentation of the evidence and any evidence tending to rebut the presumption is not admissible

    CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION

  • 22

    a presumption which may be contradicted or overcome by other evidence; it is satisfactory if uncontradicted

    DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTION

  • 23

    an equitable principle rooted upon natural justice which prevents persons from going back on their own acts and representations, to the prejudice of others who have relied on them.

    ESTOPPEL

  • 24

    What rule provides that there is no presumption of legitimacy of a child born after three hundred (300) days following the dissolution of the marriage or the separation of the spouses, and that whoever alleges legitimacy or illegitimacy must prove his allegation?

    PRESUMPTION OF LEGITIMACY AND ILLEGITIMACY

  • 25

    is the examination-in-chief of a witness by the party presenting him on the facts relevant to the issue.

    DIRECT EXAMINATION

  • 26

    It is the questioning of a witness by the adverse party after the direct examination, intended to test the accuracy, truthfulness, or bias of the witness.

    CROSS EXAMINATION

  • 27

    It is the examination conducted by the party who presented the witness, after cross-examination, to explain or supplement the answers of the witness.

    RE-DIRECT EXAMINATION

  • 28

    It is the examination by the adverse party after the re-direct examination, limited to matters raised in the re-direct or as allowed by the court.

    RE-CROSS EXAMINATION

  • 29

    It is the act of calling a witness to the stand again after both sides have finished examining him, which can only be done with the permission of the court.

    RECALLING WITNESS

  • 30

    It is a type of question that suggests to the witness the answer which the examining party desires.

    LEADING QUESTION

  • 31

    It is a question that assumes as true a fact not yet testified to by the witness, or contrary to what the witness has previously stated.

    MISLEADING QUESTION

  • 32

    one directed against the alleged defect in the formulation of the question

    FORMAL OBJECTION

  • 33

    one made and directed against the very nature of the evidence

    SUBSTANTIVE OBJECTION

  • 34

    It is the act of attaching documents or things that the court excluded as evidence, so that they form part of the case record.

    TENDER OF EXCLUDED EVIDENCE

  • 35

    It is the legal term used to describe the process of making sure that excluded evidence is still placed on record for possible review on appeal.

    OFFER OF PROOF