ログイン

social psychology chap 2

social psychology chap 2
59問 • 2年前
  • Angel Arce
  • 通報

    問題一覧

  • 1

    It occurs when we are labeled, and others’ views and expectations of us are affected by that labeling

    labeling bias

  • 2

    It happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.

    self-labeling

  • 3

    Refers to identifying and utilizing social cues to make judgments about social roles, rules, relationships, context, or the characteristics (e.g., trustworthiness) of others.

    social perception

  • 4

    the focus is on the effects of emotional states, motives and values on the ease of difficulty with which objects are perceived and judged. Social meanings are often attached to stimulus objects.

    object perception

  • 5

    the focus is on how we come to know about other people’s intentions, attitudes, ideas, emotions and behaviour so that we will be able to describe them, understand them, explain their behaviour and form or change our impressions, opinions and feelings about them.

    person perception

  • 6

    occurs when we are labeled, and others’ views and expectations of us are affected by that labeling

    labeling bias

  • 7

    happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.

    self-labeling

  • 8

    individuals turn prejudice directed toward them by others onto themselves. I

    internalized prejudice

  • 9

    may occur, which happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.

    self labeling

  • 10

    occurs when we learn about our abilities and skills, about the appropriateness and validity of our opinions, and about our relative social status by comparing our own attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors with those of others.

    social comparison

  • 11

    is the way a person views him/herself. It is the continuous process of determining personal growth and progress, which can be raised or lowered by the behaviour of a close other (a person that is psychologically close).

    self evaluation

  • 12

    refers to how people attempt to present themselves to control or shape how others (called the audience) view them. It involves expressing oneself and behaving in ways that create a desired impression.

    self presentation

  • 13

    refers to how people attempt to present themselves to control or shape how others (called the audience) view them. It involves expressing oneself and behaving in ways that create a desired impression.

    impression management

  • 14

    which can be direct claims of a particular image, such as when a person claims to be altruistic.

    verbalizations

  • 15

    - people self-present nonverbally in their physical appearance, body language, and other behaviour. Smiling, eye contact, and nods of agreement can convey a wealth of information.

    non verbal presentation

  • 16

    people self-present through the props they surround themselves with and through their associations.

    presentation with props

  • 17

    People judge others based on their associations. For example, being in the company of politicians or movie stars conveys an image of importance, and not surprisingly, many people display photographs of themselves with famous people.

    association

  • 18

    The Filipino concept of self reflects a

    collective perspective

  • 19

    as Filipinos tend to emphasize values and traits that promote

    interpersonal cooperation, reciprocity and social acceptance

  • 20

    comprises the set of ideas, images, beliefs or schemas a person has about the self (Markus and Wurf, 1987).

    self concept

  • 21

    - the perceiver regards a momentary characteristic of the person as if it were an enduring attribute.

    temporal extension

  • 22

    to the stimulus person he resembles.

    assigning some of the traits of a pamiliar person

  • 23

    the stimulus person according to certain identifying characteristics. A person is then assigned all the attributes which are considered to belong to that class of persons.

    caregorization/ classification

  • 24

    analogy is a linguistic comparison of two objects that emphasizes the similarities between those two objects which is often used as a means of describing a new object or concept by comparing it to something that is more familiar.

    inference by analogy

  • 25

    - a person leaps from a physical characteristic to a direct inference about some personality attribute. The inference is made possible by the direct applicability to the personality attribute of the meanings attached to the physical characteristics

    methqphorical generalization

  • 26

    a person bases a conclusion about personality on the functioning of some physical attribute.

    finctional inference

  • 27

    refers to the process by which one integrates and organizes various sources of information and inferences about another into a consistent meaningful whole or an overall judgment.

    impression formation

  • 28

    the stimulus person says can give a lot of information about him.

    verbal curs

  • 29

    can be used by the perceiver to assess the other.

    non verbal cues

  • 30

    is one of the first things that we notice about a person for the first time we meet them. However, only certain aspects of appearance have been shown to influence an impression markedly.

    physical appearance

  • 31

    these play an important role in communication and certain emotional expressions are innate. Emotions such as happiness, surprise, anger, sadness, fear and disgust can be quickly identified cross-culturally.

    facial expressions

  • 32

    variations in speech other than the actual words or syntax, or paralanguage, carry a great deal of meaning. Pitch of the voice, loudness, rhythm, inflections and hesitations also convey information.

    paralamguage

  • 33

    this is an especially interesting form of nonverbal communication. The meaning of eye contact depends on the context; but in almost all social situations, eye contact communicate information. Eye contact regulates conversations.

    eye contact

  • 34

    the meaning of gestures depend on the context, the person doing the action, the culture, and many other factors. Gestures vary from straightforward, direct gestures to very subtle ones.

    gestutr

  • 35

    This is the main dimension in person perception. It is considered the most important and the most powerful aspect of first impressions. In this context, people think primarily in terms of liking or disliking the person perceived. Our immediate impression may be composed of other dimensions, but they tend mainly to be parts of an overall warm, lukewarm, cool or cold responses

    evaluation

  • 36

    this refers to the extent to which the information or characteristics and traits that are perceived in the other people are in agreement or in harmony with one another or with our overall impression.

    consistency

  • 37

    we assume that a person have favourable traits if we already have an earlier positive impression on him or her. It is probable that we will not attribute unfavourable traits to him/ her even if there is contradictory information about that person. The perceiver distorts or rearrange the information to minimize or eliminate the inconsistency.

    evaluative consistency

  • 38

    exists when we infer an additional trait that is synonymous with the known trait and tend not to infer an opposite trait. For example, we are more likely to assume a generous person is extravagant than he is stingy.

    descriptive consistet

  • 39

    In this model, the perceiver had previously evaluated positively some known characteristics or traits of the stimulus person. Upon obtaining new positive information about the same person, the perceiver simply combines the old and new information.

    addictive model

  • 40

    In this process, all available information about the stimulus person are regarded as equally important in the impression formation. Averaging tends to equalize the weight given to all perceived information and traits. Moderately positive information will lower the overall impression on the perceived person.

    qveraging model

  • 41

    Solomon Asch’s research (1940) indicates that not all traits are created equal, and therefore a simple averaging model will sometimes not work for the final overall impression. He believed that certain traits- which he referred as central traits- tend to be dominant, exerting a disproportionate influence on people’s overall impressions and causing them to assume the presence of other traits.

    centraltraits effect

  • 42

    This model by Norman Anderson (1968, 1981) attempts to reconcile the averaging model and the central traits effect. According to this model, just as people assign certain scale values to traits, they also assign specific weights to traits which determines their importance to the overall impression.

    weighted averageing model

  • 43

    This involves having a general impression of someone as favourable/ good or unfavourable/ bad and this affects our perception of many of his/ her other more specific traits. In a “positive halo effect”, one who is labelled as good is then attributed with all other good qualities. On the contrary, “negative halo effect or forked-tail effect” is that where one who is labelled as bad is seen as having all bad qualities.

    halo effect

  • 44

    This is the tendency of people to assume that others are similar to them especially when they are known to be in similar demographic features such as age, race, and socioeconomic status.

    assumed simiralrity

  • 45

    This is our general tendency to express positive evaluations of people more often than negative evaluations. This is also called the leniency effect. Ratings of stimulus persons in laboratory studies and even public opinion polls show that political leaders are consistently rated as more pleasant in the absence of specific information about them.

    positivity bias

  • 46

    - a sweet-lemon philosophy or reaction that is well despite obvious evidence to the contrary. This suggests that people feel better if they are surrounded by good things, pleasant experiences, nice people, good weather, etc. and therefore are motivated to see the world and others through “rose- colored glasses”.

    polyana principle

  • 47

    This is the tendency of people to give more weight to unfavourable attributes or negative attributes or negative traits than favourable traits in forming impression of another person. This tendency to direct attention to negatively evaluated stimuli, like the tendency to notice fearful and angry faces in a crowd, is believed to have survival value for human beings.

    nwgative bias

  • 48

    when perceiving the characteristics or interests of others, we tend to believe that they are similar to ours.

    false sensus bias

  • 49

    his is to assure that our thoughts, beliefs and/ or actions are correct as well as to lessen the pressure to change them in the face of conflicting evidence, we assume that others think and behave as we do.

    self justification

  • 50

    this is the tendency to seek out the company of those whose thoughts, beliefs, values and behaviors are similar to our own. Hence, we tend to overestimate the commonness of our responses.

    selective expusote

  • 51

    we tend to think that our friends share our characteristics just because we like them. Conversely, we tend to think that we are different from our enemies just because we do not like them.

    perfeption of similarity because of liking

  • 52

    this is the effect of first impressions which is so strong that it may have implications in relationships. However, in cases where the interaction between the perceiver and stimulus person is extended in time or the quality of relationship has gone beyond the superficial level, opportunity to know the real person is present. Thus the perceiver tends to be more objective.

    primacy effect

  • 53

    this is the tendency of the perceiver to have an overall evaluation of a person based on the last information/ impression the perceiver had about the stimulus person. One condition where recency effect can occur is when information about a person is presented at long intervals.

    recency effect

  • 54

    our initial beliefs about other people sometimes persist even when the original basis for those beliefs has been completely disconfirmed

    belief perseverance

  • 55

    we tend to seek, interpret and remember information in such a way that conforms or fits to our pre-existing though and beliefs. In other words, we see what we expect. When a person’s behaviour is consistent with what we expect during the initial encounter, we tend not to pay much attention to him in succeeding encounters because instead rely on our existing beliefs about him for further assumptions about his behaviour

    cognitive confirmity bias

  • 56

    this is also known as “self-fulfilling prophecy”. We tend to behave towards others in a manner that would elicit behaviors from them that seem to match or fulfil our expectations or prophecies. Our behaviour reflects more concern about the confirmation of our personal beliefs and expectations, hence there is failure to be truly open to new information.

    behavioral confirmatory bias

  • 57

    we tend to overestimate the correctness of our beliefs or the accuracy of our judgments than we should. This is more likely when we are unaware of the true determinants of behaviour

    overconfidence effect

  • 58

    this is observed when we look back (with hindsight) we tend to remember our past judgments as having been more accurate than they really were. There is this “I knew it all along” effect.

    hindsight bias

  • 59

    is the assigning of generalized and value-laden impressions that people of one group use to characterize those another group.

    sereotuping

  • Theories of Personality

    Theories of Personality

    Angel Arce · 20問 · 2年前

    Theories of Personality

    Theories of Personality

    20問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    GD

    GD

    Angel Arce · 18問 · 2年前

    GD

    GD

    18問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    cognitive

    cognitive

    Angel Arce · 107問 · 2年前

    cognitive

    cognitive

    107問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    abnormal psychology chapter 1

    abnormal psychology chapter 1

    Angel Arce · 33問 · 2年前

    abnormal psychology chapter 1

    abnormal psychology chapter 1

    33問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    social psychology chap 1

    social psychology chap 1

    Angel Arce · 28問 · 2年前

    social psychology chap 1

    social psychology chap 1

    28問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    io psychology chapter 3

    io psychology chapter 3

    Angel Arce · 32問 · 2年前

    io psychology chapter 3

    io psychology chapter 3

    32問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    social psychology chap 3

    social psychology chap 3

    Angel Arce · 31問 · 2年前

    social psychology chap 3

    social psychology chap 3

    31問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    FIELD METHODS

    FIELD METHODS

    Angel Arce · 40問 · 2年前

    FIELD METHODS

    FIELD METHODS

    40問 • 2年前
    Angel Arce

    religion

    religion

    Angel Arce · 38問 · 1年前

    religion

    religion

    38問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    psych assessment

    psych assessment

    Angel Arce · 100問 · 1年前

    psych assessment

    psych assessment

    100問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    part 2 psych assessment

    part 2 psych assessment

    Angel Arce · 30問 · 1年前

    part 2 psych assessment

    part 2 psych assessment

    30問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    Filipino Psychology

    Filipino Psychology

    Angel Arce · 45問 · 1年前

    Filipino Psychology

    Filipino Psychology

    45問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    test development

    test development

    Angel Arce · 24問 · 1年前

    test development

    test development

    24問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    labor laws

    labor laws

    Angel Arce · 18問 · 1年前

    labor laws

    labor laws

    18問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    biochemistry

    biochemistry

    Angel Arce · 15問 · 1年前

    biochemistry

    biochemistry

    15問 • 1年前
    Angel Arce

    問題一覧

  • 1

    It occurs when we are labeled, and others’ views and expectations of us are affected by that labeling

    labeling bias

  • 2

    It happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.

    self-labeling

  • 3

    Refers to identifying and utilizing social cues to make judgments about social roles, rules, relationships, context, or the characteristics (e.g., trustworthiness) of others.

    social perception

  • 4

    the focus is on the effects of emotional states, motives and values on the ease of difficulty with which objects are perceived and judged. Social meanings are often attached to stimulus objects.

    object perception

  • 5

    the focus is on how we come to know about other people’s intentions, attitudes, ideas, emotions and behaviour so that we will be able to describe them, understand them, explain their behaviour and form or change our impressions, opinions and feelings about them.

    person perception

  • 6

    occurs when we are labeled, and others’ views and expectations of us are affected by that labeling

    labeling bias

  • 7

    happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.

    self-labeling

  • 8

    individuals turn prejudice directed toward them by others onto themselves. I

    internalized prejudice

  • 9

    may occur, which happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.

    self labeling

  • 10

    occurs when we learn about our abilities and skills, about the appropriateness and validity of our opinions, and about our relative social status by comparing our own attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors with those of others.

    social comparison

  • 11

    is the way a person views him/herself. It is the continuous process of determining personal growth and progress, which can be raised or lowered by the behaviour of a close other (a person that is psychologically close).

    self evaluation

  • 12

    refers to how people attempt to present themselves to control or shape how others (called the audience) view them. It involves expressing oneself and behaving in ways that create a desired impression.

    self presentation

  • 13

    refers to how people attempt to present themselves to control or shape how others (called the audience) view them. It involves expressing oneself and behaving in ways that create a desired impression.

    impression management

  • 14

    which can be direct claims of a particular image, such as when a person claims to be altruistic.

    verbalizations

  • 15

    - people self-present nonverbally in their physical appearance, body language, and other behaviour. Smiling, eye contact, and nods of agreement can convey a wealth of information.

    non verbal presentation

  • 16

    people self-present through the props they surround themselves with and through their associations.

    presentation with props

  • 17

    People judge others based on their associations. For example, being in the company of politicians or movie stars conveys an image of importance, and not surprisingly, many people display photographs of themselves with famous people.

    association

  • 18

    The Filipino concept of self reflects a

    collective perspective

  • 19

    as Filipinos tend to emphasize values and traits that promote

    interpersonal cooperation, reciprocity and social acceptance

  • 20

    comprises the set of ideas, images, beliefs or schemas a person has about the self (Markus and Wurf, 1987).

    self concept

  • 21

    - the perceiver regards a momentary characteristic of the person as if it were an enduring attribute.

    temporal extension

  • 22

    to the stimulus person he resembles.

    assigning some of the traits of a pamiliar person

  • 23

    the stimulus person according to certain identifying characteristics. A person is then assigned all the attributes which are considered to belong to that class of persons.

    caregorization/ classification

  • 24

    analogy is a linguistic comparison of two objects that emphasizes the similarities between those two objects which is often used as a means of describing a new object or concept by comparing it to something that is more familiar.

    inference by analogy

  • 25

    - a person leaps from a physical characteristic to a direct inference about some personality attribute. The inference is made possible by the direct applicability to the personality attribute of the meanings attached to the physical characteristics

    methqphorical generalization

  • 26

    a person bases a conclusion about personality on the functioning of some physical attribute.

    finctional inference

  • 27

    refers to the process by which one integrates and organizes various sources of information and inferences about another into a consistent meaningful whole or an overall judgment.

    impression formation

  • 28

    the stimulus person says can give a lot of information about him.

    verbal curs

  • 29

    can be used by the perceiver to assess the other.

    non verbal cues

  • 30

    is one of the first things that we notice about a person for the first time we meet them. However, only certain aspects of appearance have been shown to influence an impression markedly.

    physical appearance

  • 31

    these play an important role in communication and certain emotional expressions are innate. Emotions such as happiness, surprise, anger, sadness, fear and disgust can be quickly identified cross-culturally.

    facial expressions

  • 32

    variations in speech other than the actual words or syntax, or paralanguage, carry a great deal of meaning. Pitch of the voice, loudness, rhythm, inflections and hesitations also convey information.

    paralamguage

  • 33

    this is an especially interesting form of nonverbal communication. The meaning of eye contact depends on the context; but in almost all social situations, eye contact communicate information. Eye contact regulates conversations.

    eye contact

  • 34

    the meaning of gestures depend on the context, the person doing the action, the culture, and many other factors. Gestures vary from straightforward, direct gestures to very subtle ones.

    gestutr

  • 35

    This is the main dimension in person perception. It is considered the most important and the most powerful aspect of first impressions. In this context, people think primarily in terms of liking or disliking the person perceived. Our immediate impression may be composed of other dimensions, but they tend mainly to be parts of an overall warm, lukewarm, cool or cold responses

    evaluation

  • 36

    this refers to the extent to which the information or characteristics and traits that are perceived in the other people are in agreement or in harmony with one another or with our overall impression.

    consistency

  • 37

    we assume that a person have favourable traits if we already have an earlier positive impression on him or her. It is probable that we will not attribute unfavourable traits to him/ her even if there is contradictory information about that person. The perceiver distorts or rearrange the information to minimize or eliminate the inconsistency.

    evaluative consistency

  • 38

    exists when we infer an additional trait that is synonymous with the known trait and tend not to infer an opposite trait. For example, we are more likely to assume a generous person is extravagant than he is stingy.

    descriptive consistet

  • 39

    In this model, the perceiver had previously evaluated positively some known characteristics or traits of the stimulus person. Upon obtaining new positive information about the same person, the perceiver simply combines the old and new information.

    addictive model

  • 40

    In this process, all available information about the stimulus person are regarded as equally important in the impression formation. Averaging tends to equalize the weight given to all perceived information and traits. Moderately positive information will lower the overall impression on the perceived person.

    qveraging model

  • 41

    Solomon Asch’s research (1940) indicates that not all traits are created equal, and therefore a simple averaging model will sometimes not work for the final overall impression. He believed that certain traits- which he referred as central traits- tend to be dominant, exerting a disproportionate influence on people’s overall impressions and causing them to assume the presence of other traits.

    centraltraits effect

  • 42

    This model by Norman Anderson (1968, 1981) attempts to reconcile the averaging model and the central traits effect. According to this model, just as people assign certain scale values to traits, they also assign specific weights to traits which determines their importance to the overall impression.

    weighted averageing model

  • 43

    This involves having a general impression of someone as favourable/ good or unfavourable/ bad and this affects our perception of many of his/ her other more specific traits. In a “positive halo effect”, one who is labelled as good is then attributed with all other good qualities. On the contrary, “negative halo effect or forked-tail effect” is that where one who is labelled as bad is seen as having all bad qualities.

    halo effect

  • 44

    This is the tendency of people to assume that others are similar to them especially when they are known to be in similar demographic features such as age, race, and socioeconomic status.

    assumed simiralrity

  • 45

    This is our general tendency to express positive evaluations of people more often than negative evaluations. This is also called the leniency effect. Ratings of stimulus persons in laboratory studies and even public opinion polls show that political leaders are consistently rated as more pleasant in the absence of specific information about them.

    positivity bias

  • 46

    - a sweet-lemon philosophy or reaction that is well despite obvious evidence to the contrary. This suggests that people feel better if they are surrounded by good things, pleasant experiences, nice people, good weather, etc. and therefore are motivated to see the world and others through “rose- colored glasses”.

    polyana principle

  • 47

    This is the tendency of people to give more weight to unfavourable attributes or negative attributes or negative traits than favourable traits in forming impression of another person. This tendency to direct attention to negatively evaluated stimuli, like the tendency to notice fearful and angry faces in a crowd, is believed to have survival value for human beings.

    nwgative bias

  • 48

    when perceiving the characteristics or interests of others, we tend to believe that they are similar to ours.

    false sensus bias

  • 49

    his is to assure that our thoughts, beliefs and/ or actions are correct as well as to lessen the pressure to change them in the face of conflicting evidence, we assume that others think and behave as we do.

    self justification

  • 50

    this is the tendency to seek out the company of those whose thoughts, beliefs, values and behaviors are similar to our own. Hence, we tend to overestimate the commonness of our responses.

    selective expusote

  • 51

    we tend to think that our friends share our characteristics just because we like them. Conversely, we tend to think that we are different from our enemies just because we do not like them.

    perfeption of similarity because of liking

  • 52

    this is the effect of first impressions which is so strong that it may have implications in relationships. However, in cases where the interaction between the perceiver and stimulus person is extended in time or the quality of relationship has gone beyond the superficial level, opportunity to know the real person is present. Thus the perceiver tends to be more objective.

    primacy effect

  • 53

    this is the tendency of the perceiver to have an overall evaluation of a person based on the last information/ impression the perceiver had about the stimulus person. One condition where recency effect can occur is when information about a person is presented at long intervals.

    recency effect

  • 54

    our initial beliefs about other people sometimes persist even when the original basis for those beliefs has been completely disconfirmed

    belief perseverance

  • 55

    we tend to seek, interpret and remember information in such a way that conforms or fits to our pre-existing though and beliefs. In other words, we see what we expect. When a person’s behaviour is consistent with what we expect during the initial encounter, we tend not to pay much attention to him in succeeding encounters because instead rely on our existing beliefs about him for further assumptions about his behaviour

    cognitive confirmity bias

  • 56

    this is also known as “self-fulfilling prophecy”. We tend to behave towards others in a manner that would elicit behaviors from them that seem to match or fulfil our expectations or prophecies. Our behaviour reflects more concern about the confirmation of our personal beliefs and expectations, hence there is failure to be truly open to new information.

    behavioral confirmatory bias

  • 57

    we tend to overestimate the correctness of our beliefs or the accuracy of our judgments than we should. This is more likely when we are unaware of the true determinants of behaviour

    overconfidence effect

  • 58

    this is observed when we look back (with hindsight) we tend to remember our past judgments as having been more accurate than they really were. There is this “I knew it all along” effect.

    hindsight bias

  • 59

    is the assigning of generalized and value-laden impressions that people of one group use to characterize those another group.

    sereotuping