CLJ3 (PRELIMS)

51問 • 1年前

ユーザ名非公開

通報

問題一覧

BRANCH OF LAW

DEFINES CRIME, TREATS THE NATURE OF THE CRIME, PROVIDES FOR THEIR PUNISHMENT

HUMAN FREE WILL AND PURPOSE OF PENALTY IS RETRIBUTION

CLASSIC THEORY

THE SUM OF SOCIAL, NATURAL AND ECONOMIC

POSITIVIST THEORY

IT IS THE COMBINATION OF CLASSICAL AND POSITIVIST

ECLECTIC THEORY

PROTECTION OF SOCIETY FROM ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL WRONG DOERS

UTILITARIAN THEORY

REVISED PENAL CODE (RPC)

RA 3815

RPC

REVISED PENAL CODE

SPL

SPECIAL PENAL LAW

ISSUED DURING MARTIAL LAW BY MARCOS

PENAL PRESIDENTIAL DECREES

"THE ACT CANNOT BE CRIMINAL UNLESS THE MIND IS CRIMINAL"

ACTUS NON FACIT REUM NISI SIT REA

THERE IS NO CRIME IF THERE IS NO LAW PUNISHING IT

NULLUM CRIMEN NULLA POENA SINE LEGE

THE LAW HAVE 2 INTERPRETATIONS

DOCTRINE OF PRO REO

AN ACT AGAINST MY WILL IS NOT MY ACT

ACTUS ME INVITO FACTUS NON EST MEUS FACTUS

REFERS TO THE GENERIC TERM OF WRONG DOING

CRIME

DECEIT

DOLO

FAULT

CULPA

ALL THE ELEMENTS NECESSARY FOR EXECUTION AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

CONSUMMATED

PERFORMS ALL ACTS BUT FAILURE TO EXECUTE OR KILL

FRUSTRATED

DOES NOT PERFORM ALL THE ACTS AND NO EXECUTION

ATTEMPTED

PENALTY OF ARRESTO MENOR (1D TO 30D)

LIGHT FELONIES

PRISION CORRECTIONAL (6M 1D TO 4Y)

LESS GRAVE FELONIES

RECLUSION PERPETUA

GRAVE FELONIES

WRONG FROM ITS VERY NATURE

MALE INSE

PROHIBITED BY THE LAW

MALA PROHIBITA

ALWAYS CONSUMMATED SUCH AS IMPOSSIBLE CRIMES

FORMAL CRIMES

VARIOUS STAGES OF EXECUTION NAMELY CONSUMMATED

MATERIAL CRIMES

THE LAW IS AMBIGUOUS

LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION LAW

CRIMINAL LAW OF THE COUNTRY GOVERNS ALL PERSON RACE

GENERALITY

FOUND GUILTY OF CRIMES FOR 3 TIMES

HABITUAL DELINQUENT

RIGHT OF ANY PERSON TO BE GIVEN NOTICE AND HEARD

DUE PROCESS

A LAW WHICH MAKES AN ACT DONE BEFORE THE PASSAE OF THE LAW

EX POST FACTO

LEGISLATIVE ACT WHICH INFLICTS PUNISHMENT OUT TRIAL

BILL OF ATTAINDER

AN ACT OR OMISSION PUNISHABLE BY RPC

FELONY

ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE REVISED PENAL CODE

FELONIES

ACTS IN VIOLATION OF SPECIAL LAW

OFFENSES

VIOLATION OF AN ORDINANCE

INFRACTION

PURPOSE TO USE A PARTICULAR MEANS TO EFFECT SUCH RESULTS

CRIMINAL INTENT

VOLUNTARINESS ON THE PART OF THE PERSON TO COMMIT OMISSION

FREEDOM OF ACTION

THE CAPACITY TO KNOW AND UNDERSTAND

INTELLIGENCE

CRIMES RESULT OF IMPRUDENCE

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE

REFERS TO THE GRAVATION OF THE OFFENSE

MENS REA

MISTAKE IN IDENTITY

ERROR IN PERSONAE

MISTAKE IN THE BLOW

ABERRATIO ICTUS

THE INJURY IS ON THE INTENDED VICTIM RESULTING CONSEQUENCE IS GRAVE WRONG

PRAETER INTENTIONEM

INTENDED ACT COMPLETED BUT WONT AMOUNT TO A CRIME

LEGAL IMPOSSIBILITY

EXTRANEOUS CIRCUMSTANCES

PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY

NATURAL AND CONTINUES SEQUENCE

PROXIMATE CAUSE

TWO OR MORE FOME TO AN AGREEMENT

CONSPIRACY

PERSON DECIDES TO COMMIT A FELONY

PROPOSAL

A PERSON WHO ACTS UNDER THE RPC DOES NOT COMMIT TO A CRIME

JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES

ARTICLE 12 ENUMERATES PERSON WHO ARE EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY

EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES

CDI3 (PRELIMS)

CDI3 (PRELIMS)

CFLM (PRELIMS)

CFLM (PRELIMS)

CLJ 2 (PRELIMS)

CLJ 2 (PRELIMS)

FORENSIC3 (PRELIMS)

FORENSIC3 (PRELIMS)

LEA4 (PRELIMS)

LEA4 (PRELIMS)

CDI4 (PRELIMS)

CDI4 (PRELIMS)

CRIM4 (PRELIMS)

CRIM4 (PRELIMS)

CDI 4 (PRELIMS) PART 2

ユーザ名非公開 · 27問 · 1年前

CDI 4 (PRELIMS) PART 2

CFLM2 (MIDTERMS)

CFLM2 (MIDTERMS)

CDI3 (MIDTERMS)

CDI3 (MIDTERMS)

FOR3 (MIDTERMS)

FOR3 (MIDTERMS)

CLJ2 (MIDTERMS)

CLJ2 (MIDTERMS)

CLJ3 (MIDTERMS)

CLJ3 (MIDTERMS)

CRIM 4 (MIDTERMS)

CRIM 4 (MIDTERMS)

FOR3 (MIDTERMS) PART 2

ユーザ名非公開 · 59問 · 1年前

FOR3 (MIDTERMS) PART 2

CRIM4 (MIDTERMS) PT2

CRIM4 (MIDTERMS) PT2

問題一覧

BRANCH OF LAW

DEFINES CRIME, TREATS THE NATURE OF THE CRIME, PROVIDES FOR THEIR PUNISHMENT

HUMAN FREE WILL AND PURPOSE OF PENALTY IS RETRIBUTION

CLASSIC THEORY

THE SUM OF SOCIAL, NATURAL AND ECONOMIC

POSITIVIST THEORY

IT IS THE COMBINATION OF CLASSICAL AND POSITIVIST

ECLECTIC THEORY

PROTECTION OF SOCIETY FROM ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL WRONG DOERS

UTILITARIAN THEORY

REVISED PENAL CODE (RPC)

RA 3815

RPC

REVISED PENAL CODE

SPL

SPECIAL PENAL LAW

ISSUED DURING MARTIAL LAW BY MARCOS

PENAL PRESIDENTIAL DECREES

"THE ACT CANNOT BE CRIMINAL UNLESS THE MIND IS CRIMINAL"

ACTUS NON FACIT REUM NISI SIT REA

THERE IS NO CRIME IF THERE IS NO LAW PUNISHING IT

NULLUM CRIMEN NULLA POENA SINE LEGE

THE LAW HAVE 2 INTERPRETATIONS

DOCTRINE OF PRO REO

AN ACT AGAINST MY WILL IS NOT MY ACT

ACTUS ME INVITO FACTUS NON EST MEUS FACTUS

REFERS TO THE GENERIC TERM OF WRONG DOING

CRIME

DECEIT

DOLO

FAULT

CULPA

ALL THE ELEMENTS NECESSARY FOR EXECUTION AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

CONSUMMATED

PERFORMS ALL ACTS BUT FAILURE TO EXECUTE OR KILL

FRUSTRATED

DOES NOT PERFORM ALL THE ACTS AND NO EXECUTION

ATTEMPTED

PENALTY OF ARRESTO MENOR (1D TO 30D)

LIGHT FELONIES

PRISION CORRECTIONAL (6M 1D TO 4Y)

LESS GRAVE FELONIES

RECLUSION PERPETUA

GRAVE FELONIES

WRONG FROM ITS VERY NATURE

MALE INSE

PROHIBITED BY THE LAW

MALA PROHIBITA

ALWAYS CONSUMMATED SUCH AS IMPOSSIBLE CRIMES

FORMAL CRIMES

VARIOUS STAGES OF EXECUTION NAMELY CONSUMMATED

MATERIAL CRIMES

THE LAW IS AMBIGUOUS

LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION LAW

CRIMINAL LAW OF THE COUNTRY GOVERNS ALL PERSON RACE

GENERALITY

FOUND GUILTY OF CRIMES FOR 3 TIMES

HABITUAL DELINQUENT

RIGHT OF ANY PERSON TO BE GIVEN NOTICE AND HEARD

DUE PROCESS

A LAW WHICH MAKES AN ACT DONE BEFORE THE PASSAE OF THE LAW

EX POST FACTO

LEGISLATIVE ACT WHICH INFLICTS PUNISHMENT OUT TRIAL

BILL OF ATTAINDER

AN ACT OR OMISSION PUNISHABLE BY RPC

FELONY

ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE REVISED PENAL CODE

FELONIES

ACTS IN VIOLATION OF SPECIAL LAW

OFFENSES

VIOLATION OF AN ORDINANCE

INFRACTION

PURPOSE TO USE A PARTICULAR MEANS TO EFFECT SUCH RESULTS

CRIMINAL INTENT

VOLUNTARINESS ON THE PART OF THE PERSON TO COMMIT OMISSION

FREEDOM OF ACTION

THE CAPACITY TO KNOW AND UNDERSTAND

INTELLIGENCE

CRIMES RESULT OF IMPRUDENCE

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE

REFERS TO THE GRAVATION OF THE OFFENSE

MENS REA

MISTAKE IN IDENTITY

ERROR IN PERSONAE

MISTAKE IN THE BLOW

ABERRATIO ICTUS

THE INJURY IS ON THE INTENDED VICTIM RESULTING CONSEQUENCE IS GRAVE WRONG

PRAETER INTENTIONEM

INTENDED ACT COMPLETED BUT WONT AMOUNT TO A CRIME

LEGAL IMPOSSIBILITY

EXTRANEOUS CIRCUMSTANCES

PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY

NATURAL AND CONTINUES SEQUENCE

PROXIMATE CAUSE

TWO OR MORE FOME TO AN AGREEMENT

CONSPIRACY

PERSON DECIDES TO COMMIT A FELONY

PROPOSAL

A PERSON WHO ACTS UNDER THE RPC DOES NOT COMMIT TO A CRIME

JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES

ARTICLE 12 ENUMERATES PERSON WHO ARE EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY

EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES