ログイン

FOR QUIZ LANG NOW

Reviewer

FOR QUIZ LANG NOW
48問 • 1年前Reviewer
  • Kathlyn Pascua
  • 通報

    問題一覧

  • 1

    The process by which a researcher identifies the representative of a population to be used in his/her study

    Sampling

  • 2

    2 types of sampling method

    -probability / statistical sampling - non probability sampling

  • 3

    This is used when an accurate representation of the entire population is needed in the sample.

    Probability / statistical sampling

  • 4

    This is used when the population cannot/does not need to be sampled to represent the target population and so individuals do not have an equal chance of being sampled

    Non - probability sampling

  • 5

    5 kinds of probability /statistical sampling

    -simple random sampling -stratified random sampling -cluster sampling -multistage sampling -systematic sampling

  • 6

    are identified randomly with the help of statistical and mathematical computations.

    Simple random sampling

  • 7

    population is divided into different groups/strata based on criteria set by the researcher.

    Stratified random sampling

  • 8

    This is similar to stratified randomly sampling, but instead of grouping them based on criteria set by the researchers the individuals are randomly selected from naturally occurring groups (e.g. sections in a school).

    Cluster sampling

  • 9

    -This type of sampling is a combination of stratified random and cluster sampling. It consists of multiple stages of grouping: first from naturally occurring groups and then groups based on criteria set by the researcher.

    Multistage sampling

  • 10

    This method of sampling is the easiest since it only requires the researcher to set a fixed interval to determine the sample.

    Systematic sampling

  • 11

    4 types of non-probability sampling -

    -purposive sampling -convenience sampling -snowball sampling -quota sampling

  • 12

    are targeted and selected based on a criterion set by the researcher

    Purposive sampling

  • 13

    The sampling group is identified by the convenience of the researcher jeg, nearby, sirsady familiar)

    Convenience sampling

  • 14

    The identification of the sample group is accumulative and can come from populations not initially known by the researcher.

    Snowball sampling

  • 15

    Very similar to purposive sampling wherein the population is filtered based on a criterion set by a researcher.

    Quota sampling

  • 16

    Participants self-select themselves.

    Voluntary sampling

  • 17

    5 types of observation

    -participant -non participant -systematic / structured -unstructured -simple/contribed observation

  • 18

    This is similar to participant observation except that the researcher is NOT immersed in the setting or the participants are not aware of the researcher's presence.

    Non-participant observation

  • 19

    The researcher is immersed for prolonged periods of time in the setting where the participants/phenomenon is to be observed.

    Participant observation

  • 20

    It is when the researcher establishes specific rules for the observation and schedule (e.g. they will be observed for two (2) hours inside the school).

    Structured / systematic observation

  • 21

    It is the complete opposite of structured observation where there are no rules or guidelines set for the observation. This allows a more freeform or narrative means data collection.

    Unstructured observation

  • 22

    In both methods, the participant is unaware of the researcher and the researcher does interact or involve themselves with the setting.

    Simple and contrived observation

  • 23

    It is a method that is used when a participant can be observed directly.

    Interviews

  • 24

    3 types of interviews

    -structured interviews - semi structured interviews -unstructured interviews

  • 25

    These are "oral questionnaires". The researcher asks a list of predefined questions that only permits limited participant responses.

    Structured interview

  • 26

    This is the opposite of structured interviews. Participants will be asked one (1) general question and can explain their responses in depth.

    Unstructured interview

  • 27

    This step is focused on identifying which data is relevant and usable.

    Data cleaning or preparation

  • 28

    is meant to transform your data into manageable formats.

    Data cleaning or preparation

  • 29

    4 data exploration

    -chunking -clustering -memoing -coding

  • 30

    the act of breaking down your cleaned data and determining which parts are for what purpose (e.g., is this about participant information, background, examples provided, etc.).

    Chunking

  • 31

    the act of taking these chunks and classifying them according to labels or basic codes.

    Clustering

  • 32

    focused on creating labels and categories that represent the data accurately.

    Coding

  • 33

    three (3) patterns or levels of coding

    -Descriptive to Interpretative to Pattern -First to the second cycle -Open to Axial to Selective

  • 34

    move from summary to meaning

    Descriptive to Interpretative to Pattern

  • 35

    moves from initial theory to developing relationships between codes for the emerging theory

    Open to Axial to Selective

  • 36

    moves from describing the data units to inferring meaning

    First to the second cycle

  • 37

    the act of taking these codes and clusters and then adding notes that help explain or define them.

    Memoing

  • 38

    Used in qualitative research to verify or check if the data collected from the procedures performed by the researcher is accurate and can support the proposed discussions

    Validity

  • 39

    4 types of validity

    -Triangulation -Construct validity -Criterion-based validity -Content validity

  • 40

    It is the extent to which the questions on the instrument and the scores from these questions represent all possible questions that could be asked about the content or skill

    Content validity

  • 41

    this is the minimum index of content validity. This tests the degree by which the results or instrument measures the concept being measured.

    Face Validity

  • 42

    It is used to predict current or future performances by correlating results with another criterion of interest

    Criterion based validity

  • 43

    relates the results to an already established/validated set of scores.

    Concurrent Validity

  • 44

    relates the results to a future criterion to predict some form of behavior.

    Predictive Validity

  • 45

    is used when the goal of the study is to construct theories to understand better and predict behavior

    Construct validity

  • 46

    relates the results to a future criterion to predict some form of behavior.

    Predictive Validity

  • 47

    determines the lack of relationship among certain variables according to theory and empirical evidence

    Discriminant Validity

  • 48

    Relies on multiple validation methods to verify the results of a study.

    Triangulation

  • PLATE TECTONICS

    PLATE TECTONICS

    Kathlyn Pascua · 80問 · 1年前

    PLATE TECTONICS

    PLATE TECTONICS

    80問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    geologic time

    geologic time

    Kathlyn Pascua · 38問 · 1年前

    geologic time

    geologic time

    38問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    MGA SITWASYONG PANGWIKA SA LIPUNAN

    MGA SITWASYONG PANGWIKA SA LIPUNAN

    Kathlyn Pascua · 45問 · 1年前

    MGA SITWASYONG PANGWIKA SA LIPUNAN

    MGA SITWASYONG PANGWIKA SA LIPUNAN

    45問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    VOLLEYBALL

    VOLLEYBALL

    Kathlyn Pascua · 35問 · 1年前

    VOLLEYBALL

    VOLLEYBALL

    35問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    THEORY OF EVOLUTION

    THEORY OF EVOLUTION

    Kathlyn Pascua · 28問 · 1年前

    THEORY OF EVOLUTION

    THEORY OF EVOLUTION

    28問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    cultural, social and political institutions

    cultural, social and political institutions

    Kathlyn Pascua · 100問 · 1年前

    cultural, social and political institutions

    cultural, social and political institutions

    100問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    economic and nonstate institutions

    economic and nonstate institutions

    Kathlyn Pascua · 86問 · 1年前

    economic and nonstate institutions

    economic and nonstate institutions

    86問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    relative age dating

    relative age dating

    Kathlyn Pascua · 28問 · 1年前

    relative age dating

    relative age dating

    28問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    absolute age dating

    absolute age dating

    Kathlyn Pascua · 10問 · 1年前

    absolute age dating

    absolute age dating

    10問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    education and health system

    education and health system

    Kathlyn Pascua · 41問 · 1年前

    education and health system

    education and health system

    41問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    religion and belief system

    religion and belief system

    Kathlyn Pascua · 32問 · 1年前

    religion and belief system

    religion and belief system

    32問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    QUIZ BEE

    QUIZ BEE

    Kathlyn Pascua · 59問 · 1年前

    QUIZ BEE

    QUIZ BEE

    59問 • 1年前
    Kathlyn Pascua

    問題一覧

  • 1

    The process by which a researcher identifies the representative of a population to be used in his/her study

    Sampling

  • 2

    2 types of sampling method

    -probability / statistical sampling - non probability sampling

  • 3

    This is used when an accurate representation of the entire population is needed in the sample.

    Probability / statistical sampling

  • 4

    This is used when the population cannot/does not need to be sampled to represent the target population and so individuals do not have an equal chance of being sampled

    Non - probability sampling

  • 5

    5 kinds of probability /statistical sampling

    -simple random sampling -stratified random sampling -cluster sampling -multistage sampling -systematic sampling

  • 6

    are identified randomly with the help of statistical and mathematical computations.

    Simple random sampling

  • 7

    population is divided into different groups/strata based on criteria set by the researcher.

    Stratified random sampling

  • 8

    This is similar to stratified randomly sampling, but instead of grouping them based on criteria set by the researchers the individuals are randomly selected from naturally occurring groups (e.g. sections in a school).

    Cluster sampling

  • 9

    -This type of sampling is a combination of stratified random and cluster sampling. It consists of multiple stages of grouping: first from naturally occurring groups and then groups based on criteria set by the researcher.

    Multistage sampling

  • 10

    This method of sampling is the easiest since it only requires the researcher to set a fixed interval to determine the sample.

    Systematic sampling

  • 11

    4 types of non-probability sampling -

    -purposive sampling -convenience sampling -snowball sampling -quota sampling

  • 12

    are targeted and selected based on a criterion set by the researcher

    Purposive sampling

  • 13

    The sampling group is identified by the convenience of the researcher jeg, nearby, sirsady familiar)

    Convenience sampling

  • 14

    The identification of the sample group is accumulative and can come from populations not initially known by the researcher.

    Snowball sampling

  • 15

    Very similar to purposive sampling wherein the population is filtered based on a criterion set by a researcher.

    Quota sampling

  • 16

    Participants self-select themselves.

    Voluntary sampling

  • 17

    5 types of observation

    -participant -non participant -systematic / structured -unstructured -simple/contribed observation

  • 18

    This is similar to participant observation except that the researcher is NOT immersed in the setting or the participants are not aware of the researcher's presence.

    Non-participant observation

  • 19

    The researcher is immersed for prolonged periods of time in the setting where the participants/phenomenon is to be observed.

    Participant observation

  • 20

    It is when the researcher establishes specific rules for the observation and schedule (e.g. they will be observed for two (2) hours inside the school).

    Structured / systematic observation

  • 21

    It is the complete opposite of structured observation where there are no rules or guidelines set for the observation. This allows a more freeform or narrative means data collection.

    Unstructured observation

  • 22

    In both methods, the participant is unaware of the researcher and the researcher does interact or involve themselves with the setting.

    Simple and contrived observation

  • 23

    It is a method that is used when a participant can be observed directly.

    Interviews

  • 24

    3 types of interviews

    -structured interviews - semi structured interviews -unstructured interviews

  • 25

    These are "oral questionnaires". The researcher asks a list of predefined questions that only permits limited participant responses.

    Structured interview

  • 26

    This is the opposite of structured interviews. Participants will be asked one (1) general question and can explain their responses in depth.

    Unstructured interview

  • 27

    This step is focused on identifying which data is relevant and usable.

    Data cleaning or preparation

  • 28

    is meant to transform your data into manageable formats.

    Data cleaning or preparation

  • 29

    4 data exploration

    -chunking -clustering -memoing -coding

  • 30

    the act of breaking down your cleaned data and determining which parts are for what purpose (e.g., is this about participant information, background, examples provided, etc.).

    Chunking

  • 31

    the act of taking these chunks and classifying them according to labels or basic codes.

    Clustering

  • 32

    focused on creating labels and categories that represent the data accurately.

    Coding

  • 33

    three (3) patterns or levels of coding

    -Descriptive to Interpretative to Pattern -First to the second cycle -Open to Axial to Selective

  • 34

    move from summary to meaning

    Descriptive to Interpretative to Pattern

  • 35

    moves from initial theory to developing relationships between codes for the emerging theory

    Open to Axial to Selective

  • 36

    moves from describing the data units to inferring meaning

    First to the second cycle

  • 37

    the act of taking these codes and clusters and then adding notes that help explain or define them.

    Memoing

  • 38

    Used in qualitative research to verify or check if the data collected from the procedures performed by the researcher is accurate and can support the proposed discussions

    Validity

  • 39

    4 types of validity

    -Triangulation -Construct validity -Criterion-based validity -Content validity

  • 40

    It is the extent to which the questions on the instrument and the scores from these questions represent all possible questions that could be asked about the content or skill

    Content validity

  • 41

    this is the minimum index of content validity. This tests the degree by which the results or instrument measures the concept being measured.

    Face Validity

  • 42

    It is used to predict current or future performances by correlating results with another criterion of interest

    Criterion based validity

  • 43

    relates the results to an already established/validated set of scores.

    Concurrent Validity

  • 44

    relates the results to a future criterion to predict some form of behavior.

    Predictive Validity

  • 45

    is used when the goal of the study is to construct theories to understand better and predict behavior

    Construct validity

  • 46

    relates the results to a future criterion to predict some form of behavior.

    Predictive Validity

  • 47

    determines the lack of relationship among certain variables according to theory and empirical evidence

    Discriminant Validity

  • 48

    Relies on multiple validation methods to verify the results of a study.

    Triangulation