問題一覧
1
it's capability in responding to the need of the envisioned project is dissected to ensure project implementation
organizational viability
2
submitted project ideas will be evaluated against their priorities and criteria this criteria include
•the relevance of the project •the innovative character of the proposed initiative •the feasibility and potential scalability of the project •the participation and contributions of community residents slash beneficiaries and partners
3
looks into the nature of unsatisfied project demands (school health center social infra or agri related) in terms of its growth and the manner in which it is to be met
beneficiary needs analysis
4
covers physical environmental factors such as flora and fauna climatic conditions geology degree of conservation or alteration
environmentally safe
5
it presents the overall financial picture in terms of operating cash requirement profitability (for livelihood projects) and cash flows
economic capability
6
he suggests that at its inception a group is quite tentative and members to become familiar with each other
tuckman 1965
7
is a simplified financial economic analysis of project
economic capability
8
deals with environmental impact assessment
environmentally safe
9
use of ict's or software apps for more efficient service
the innovative character of the proposed initiative
10
five stage group development model
forming storming norming performing adjourning
11
suggest a very straightforward five stage cycle with fast completed at each stage
project management institute or pmi
12
social impacts on communities include issues of displacement/resettlement and associated impact on quality of life and livelihood
social acceptability
13
is made up of the following four case area
project life cycle
14
is a broad theme under which the different elements of project management will play themselves out on a practical level
project life cycle
15
does it address a priority issue the potential beneficiaries
the relevance of the project
16
the project scope
step 1: designing a project step 2: developing a project step 3: implementing a project step 4: ending/closing a project
17
according to them managing the project process is equally as important as managing the task
Bourne and Walker 2004
18
deals with social soundness and genders sensitivity of projects
social acceptability
19
project processes
initiating planning executing closing
20
suggest a very straightforward five stage cycle with task completed at each stage
project management institute (PMI)
21
he proposed a five stage group development model such as
Tuckman 1965 forming storming norming performing adjourning
22
on the other hand he proposed an alternative at how we look at project life cycle
Tuckman 1965
23
program implementers in determining the action they must take to bring about the successful operation of a project operation
project feasibility study
24
is a formal process
project management
25
the logic of the project in terms of different objective levels risk and killer assumption
the feasibility and potential scalability of the project
26
the project organization and the management analysis are critically look into
organizational viability
27
can lead to a project not achieving its goals
hostile internal or external environment
28
support agencies and funding organizations are proponents to be very clear and detailed about the entire project cycle management and proactively identify projects and partners stakeholders
project identification
29
refers to the internal and the external environment
project context
30
project management is a formal process. it uses tools to ensure that:
detailed task are identified and laid out responsible people are allocated to the task measurable objectives are put in place to ensure that targets are met changes are made in time to ensure targets can be met the budget is well controlled the correct allocation of equipment and materials is made throughout the lifespan of the project
31
an analysis which a certain checks the viability of an undertaking and guides organization
project feasibility study
32
discusses the nature of the project the type of technology needed its availability the proper mix of resources and how to optimize its uses
technical feasibility