SA ARTICLE 4 PAR 1 ANO ANG LATIN TERM NI MISTAKE IN THE BLOW ?

SA MISTAKE IN IDENTITY ANO ANG PENALTY NA MASUSUNOD ?

SA ABERATIO ICTUS or mistake in the blow ANONG PENALTY ANG MASUSUNOD ?

ANO ANG LATIN TERM NI MISTAKE IN IDENTITY?

NAPAGKAMALAN ?

IBA TINANMAAN ?

INJURIOUS RESULT IS GREATER THAN THE INTENDED LATIN TERM?

ANG EFFECT PENALTY SA PRAETER INTENTIONEM ?

SA ARTICLE 4 PARAGRAPH 1 MAYROON BANG INTENTION O WALA ?

IS THAT CAUSE WHICH IN THE ORDINARY AND CONTINUOUS SEQUENCE, UNBROKEN BY AN EFFICIENT INTERVENING CAUSE PRODUCES THE INJURY?

ARE THOSE THAT BREAK THE RELATION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT?

THE FELONY COMMITTED IS NOT THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE RESULTING INJURY When?

THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT AFFECT THE CAUSE AND EFFECT PELATIONSHIP ?

CONSTRUCTION OF PENAL LAWS 1.Penal laws are strictly construed against the state and liberally in favor of the accused 2.If there is a conflict between the Spanish text and the English text, the _____ text prevails.

Requisites Of Art. 4 (1) 1. An ________ has been committed. 2. The wrong done to the victim be the direct, natural and logical consequence of the felony committed by the offender. 3. The felony done must be the proximate cause of the resulting injury.

Requisites Of Art. 4 (1) 1. An intentional Felony has been committed. 2. The wrong done to the victim be the direct, ____ and logical consequence of the felony committed by the offender. 3. The felony done must be the proximate cause of the resulting injury.

Requisites Of Art. 4 (1) 1. An intentional Felony has been committed. 2. The wrong done to the victim be the direct, natural and logical consequence of the felony committed by the offender. 3. The felony done must be the ________ of the resulting injury.

Juan only wanted to box Pedro, but Pedro died when he fell to the pavement resulting to brain hemorrhage.

Juan shoot Pedro, but it was Jose who was injured.

Juan, intended to shoot Pedro, but it was Jose whom he shot because he mistook Jose to be Pedro.

The following does not affect the CAUSE and EFFECT relationship. 1. _______of the victim 2. Concurrent conditions 3. Supervening Conditions

The following does not affect the CAUSE and EFFECT relationship. 1. Pre existing conditions of the victim 2. ______ conditions 3. Supervening Conditions

The following does not affect the CAUSE and EFFECT relationship. 1. Pre existing conditions of the victim 2. Concurrent conditions 3. ________ Conditions

Pedro threatened Juan and chased him with a knife. Fearing for his life. Juan jumped to the river. Juan drowned because he did not know how to swim.

Juan was weak and suffering from tuberculosis. Pedro gave him fist blows causing internal hemorrhage. Juan died as a result.

Pedro stabbed Juan in the stomach. Juan did not want to go to the hospital so he just stayed in his house hoping to recover. Juan died.

Pedro stabbed Juan. Maria saw what happened and called the ambulance. Ambulance took 2 hours to arrive. By that time Juan lost a lot of blood and died.

Pedro stabbed Juan. Maria saw what happened and called the ambulance. Ambulance took 2 hours to arrive. By that time Juan lost a lot of blood and died.

Pedro shot Juan. Juan was brought to a clinic but because of erroneous and unskillful surgical operation by the doctors. Juan died.

efficient intervening cause a. there is an _______ that intervened between the felony committed and the resulting injury;

Efficient intervening cause b. the resulting injury is due to the _______ of the accused.

Juan only wanted to box Pedro, but Pedro died when he fell to the pavement resulting to brain hemorrhage.Is Juan liable for the death of Pedro?

Pedro chased Juan with a knife because of fear the latter jumped into the water because he did not know how to swim he sank down and died of drowning. Is Pedro liable for the death of Juan?

Juan stabbed Pedro at the finger causing a non mortal wound. Inorder to aggravate the wound for the purpose of charging Juan a high payment, It caused an infection causing his death. Is Juan liable for the death of Pedro?

Juan was weak and suffering from tuberculosis. Pedro gave him fist blows causing internal hemorrhage. Juan died as a result. Pedro states that he is not liable because Juan has already a disease. Is the statement of Pedro correct?

Pedro stabbed Juan in the stomach. Juan did not want to go to the hospital so he just stayed in his house hoping to recover. Juan died. Is Pedro liable for the death of Juan?

Pedro shot Juan. Juan was brought to a clinic but because of erroneous and unskillful surgical operation by the doctors. Juan died. Can Pedro invokes it is the fault of the doctor?

Pedro struck Juan with his fist and knocked him down and a horse near them jumped upon Juan and killed him. Is Pedro liable for the death of Juan?