問題一覧
1
especial reason for longer introduction
2
2
of longer introduction is required
500-600 words
3
length of typical journal article
250-300 words
4
approach to writing good introduction
6
5
structure 2
known unknown:importance possible treatment/ solution support for B specific problems approach/procedure
6
structure 1
known unknown quesrion approach
7
general topic of funnel-shaped
-what is known or believed about the topic -what is unknown or the problem with what is known -unknown or the problem leades to the statement of the question
8
shape of introduction
funnel-shaped
9
funnel-shaped
known, unknown or problem question
10
select the most important and most elegant studies and can also includes review articles
rationale/introduction
11
must reflect the key work that led to the question of paper
rationale/introduction
12
what is the significance of the results
rationale/introduction
13
prepares reader wheter or not they are experts to understand the paper
rationale
14
awakens the readers interest
rationale
15
why it is being studied
rationale
16
what is being reported
rationale
17
describe the origin of the problem and circumstances
rationale
18
set the stage for the setting of the entire report/bg of the study
rationale
19
words numbering from 40 up to 200 words
long direct quotation or block quotation
20
use of action verbalize claim
integral citation
21
refer to the author
in-text citation
22
types of citation
in-text citation integral citation nonintegral citation
23
only part of the authors sentence
short direct quotation
24
explain what the text means to you using your own words
paraphrase
25
APA
american psychological association
26
MLA
modern language
27
is shortened version
summary
28
patterns
summary paraphrase short direct quotation long dirext or block quotation or extract lense of verbs for reporting
29
provides summary statement to the overall state of knowledge
conclusion
30
ties together the major findings of the studies reviewed
summary/synthesis
31
have found about the research problem
body
32
introduces general topic
introduction
33
parts of the review of literature
introduction body summary/synthesis conclusion
34
steps in literature review
5
35
where authors cite the work of others
secondary sources
36
done literature
primary sources
37
tertiary sources and show where to locate other
general references
38
what to review
general references primary resources secondary sources
39
example of sites
google scholar proquest library research
40
downloading published articles related to the topic
search and re-search the literature
41
interesting, important, current
refine the topic and audience
42
Rules of writing literature review
10
43
Plagiarism
4
44
copying the exact words of writer and passing the quoted words of as ones own words
plagiarism
45
prepared standards for studies selection
systematic
46
viewable process and paper trail
restricted focus
47
to meet certain objective based on specific research questions
systematic
48
selection by the reviewer
traditional
49
indefinite plan, premits creative and exploratory plan
traditional
50
comprehensive wide picture
traditional
51
to have thorough and clear understanding of the field
traditional
52
prepares a situation for a future research work in the form of project
scoping review
53
encourages a well known expert to do the RRL
expert review
54
researcher deal with latest research studies on the subject
state-of-the-art review
55
focuses in the theories or hypotheses and examine meaning and results of their application
critical review
56
analysis of concepts or ideas
conceptual review
57
types of traditional RRL
conceptual review critical review state-of-the-art review expert review scoping review
58
APA format
author, name of the study, published date
59
expanded new knowledge
traditional
60
which are open ended subjective questions
traditional
61
for quali research
traditonal
62
examine the body of theory
theoretical review
63
how to do systematic review
6
64
attain conclusion regarding the topic
systematic review
65
what is the main problem
systematic review
66
questions driven methodology
systematic review
67
focus not on what has been said
methodological review
68
examine past events
historical review
69
to critique and synthesizes
integrative review
70
establish opposite perspective
argumentative review
71
types of RRL
7
72
connection by its questions
variables
73
How to find RRL
5
74
functions of RRL
-to justify your study -to identify the gap -to provide rationale of the study -to have basis that will be need to support findings of study
75
purpose of RRL
10
76
relating your study to other study who moght not yet resolve or add reccommendation
purpose of RRL
77
basis of literature
establish the gap define study global, national, regional and local
78
characteristics of review of related literature
-involves the critiquing and evaluating of what other researchers done -to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge
79
major activity in the research process that requires examination of concepts
Review of related literature
80
APA format
author, name of study, published date
81
unscientifuc if presented but has no explaination
literature
82
any materials published in a book
literature
83
written works collectively
literature
84
value to the volume of research literature should be mentioned
significance of the study
85
should support government thrusts
significance of the study
86
benefited by the study must be cited
significance of the study
87
should emphaze the role in the improvement of social
significance of the study
88
have an impact on the field of specialization
significance of the study
89
present the implications or applications of the study
significance of the study
90
contributions maybe viewed from the point of the target beneficiaries
significance of the study
91
cites the usefullness of the study
significance of the study
92
where the significant contributions of the study enumerate
significance of the study
93
the researcher expresess the value or importance of the research
significance of the study
94
to the recognized weaknesses or inadequacies of the study
latter
95
is distinct from limitiation
delimitations
96
set boundaries beyond which study is no concerned
delimitations
97
sets the conditions beyond the control of the study
scope
98
gives the nature of the research process
scope and delimitation
99
its is based in the theory and emperical evidence
null hypothesis
100
expresses expected relationship between two or more variables
null hypothesis