暗記メーカー
ログイン
9
  • Lady Rose Joy Domalanta

  • 問題数 211 • 1/27/2025

    記憶度

    完璧

    31

    覚えた

    76

    うろ覚え

    0

    苦手

    0

    未解答

    0

    アカウント登録して、解答結果を保存しよう

    問題一覧

  • 1

    especial reason for longer introduction

    2

  • 2

    of longer introduction is required

    500-600 words

  • 3

    length of typical journal article

    250-300 words

  • 4

    approach to writing good introduction

    6

  • 5

    structure 2

    known unknown:importance possible treatment/ solution support for B specific problems approach/procedure

  • 6

    structure 1

    known unknown quesrion approach

  • 7

    general topic of funnel-shaped

    -what is known or believed about the topic -what is unknown or the problem with what is known -unknown or the problem leades to the statement of the question

  • 8

    shape of introduction

    funnel-shaped

  • 9

    funnel-shaped

    known, unknown or problem question

  • 10

    select the most important and most elegant studies and can also includes review articles

    rationale/introduction

  • 11

    must reflect the key work that led to the question of paper

    rationale/introduction

  • 12

    what is the significance of the results

    rationale/introduction

  • 13

    prepares reader wheter or not they are experts to understand the paper

    rationale

  • 14

    awakens the readers interest

    rationale

  • 15

    why it is being studied

    rationale

  • 16

    what is being reported

    rationale

  • 17

    describe the origin of the problem and circumstances

    rationale

  • 18

    set the stage for the setting of the entire report/bg of the study

    rationale

  • 19

    words numbering from 40 up to 200 words

    long direct quotation or block quotation

  • 20

    use of action verbalize claim

    integral citation

  • 21

    refer to the author

    in-text citation

  • 22

    types of citation

    in-text citation integral citation nonintegral citation

  • 23

    only part of the authors sentence

    short direct quotation

  • 24

    explain what the text means to you using your own words

    paraphrase

  • 25

    APA

    american psychological association

  • 26

    MLA

    modern language

  • 27

    is shortened version

    summary

  • 28

    patterns

    summary paraphrase short direct quotation long dirext or block quotation or extract lense of verbs for reporting

  • 29

    provides summary statement to the overall state of knowledge

    conclusion

  • 30

    ties together the major findings of the studies reviewed

    summary/synthesis

  • 31

    have found about the research problem

    body

  • 32

    introduces general topic

    introduction

  • 33

    parts of the review of literature

    introduction body summary/synthesis conclusion

  • 34

    steps in literature review

    5

  • 35

    where authors cite the work of others

    secondary sources

  • 36

    done literature

    primary sources

  • 37

    tertiary sources and show where to locate other

    general references

  • 38

    what to review

    general references primary resources secondary sources

  • 39

    example of sites

    google scholar proquest library research

  • 40

    downloading published articles related to the topic

    search and re-search the literature

  • 41

    interesting, important, current

    refine the topic and audience

  • 42

    Rules of writing literature review

    10

  • 43

    Plagiarism

    4

  • 44

    copying the exact words of writer and passing the quoted words of as ones own words

    plagiarism

  • 45

    prepared standards for studies selection

    systematic

  • 46

    viewable process and paper trail

    restricted focus

  • 47

    to meet certain objective based on specific research questions

    systematic

  • 48

    selection by the reviewer

    traditional

  • 49

    indefinite plan, premits creative and exploratory plan

    traditional

  • 50

    comprehensive wide picture

    traditional

  • 51

    to have thorough and clear understanding of the field

    traditional

  • 52

    prepares a situation for a future research work in the form of project

    scoping review

  • 53

    encourages a well known expert to do the RRL

    expert review

  • 54

    researcher deal with latest research studies on the subject

    state-of-the-art review

  • 55

    focuses in the theories or hypotheses and examine meaning and results of their application

    critical review

  • 56

    analysis of concepts or ideas

    conceptual review

  • 57

    types of traditional RRL

    conceptual review critical review state-of-the-art review expert review scoping review

  • 58

    APA format

    author, name of the study, published date

  • 59

    expanded new knowledge

    traditional

  • 60

    which are open ended subjective questions

    traditional

  • 61

    for quali research

    traditonal

  • 62

    examine the body of theory

    theoretical review

  • 63

    how to do systematic review

    6

  • 64

    attain conclusion regarding the topic

    systematic review

  • 65

    what is the main problem

    systematic review

  • 66

    questions driven methodology

    systematic review

  • 67

    focus not on what has been said

    methodological review

  • 68

    examine past events

    historical review

  • 69

    to critique and synthesizes

    integrative review

  • 70

    establish opposite perspective

    argumentative review

  • 71

    types of RRL

    7

  • 72

    connection by its questions

    variables

  • 73

    How to find RRL

    5

  • 74

    functions of RRL

    -to justify your study -to identify the gap -to provide rationale of the study -to have basis that will be need to support findings of study

  • 75

    purpose of RRL

    10

  • 76

    relating your study to other study who moght not yet resolve or add reccommendation

    purpose of RRL

  • 77

    basis of literature

    establish the gap define study global, national, regional and local

  • 78

    characteristics of review of related literature

    -involves the critiquing and evaluating of what other researchers done -to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge

  • 79

    major activity in the research process that requires examination of concepts

    Review of related literature

  • 80

    APA format

    author, name of study, published date

  • 81

    unscientifuc if presented but has no explaination

    literature

  • 82

    any materials published in a book

    literature

  • 83

    written works collectively

    literature

  • 84

    value to the volume of research literature should be mentioned

    significance of the study

  • 85

    should support government thrusts

    significance of the study

  • 86

    benefited by the study must be cited

    significance of the study

  • 87

    should emphaze the role in the improvement of social

    significance of the study

  • 88

    have an impact on the field of specialization

    significance of the study

  • 89

    present the implications or applications of the study

    significance of the study

  • 90

    contributions maybe viewed from the point of the target beneficiaries

    significance of the study

  • 91

    cites the usefullness of the study

    significance of the study

  • 92

    where the significant contributions of the study enumerate

    significance of the study

  • 93

    the researcher expresess the value or importance of the research

    significance of the study

  • 94

    to the recognized weaknesses or inadequacies of the study

    latter

  • 95

    is distinct from limitiation

    delimitations

  • 96

    set boundaries beyond which study is no concerned

    delimitations

  • 97

    sets the conditions beyond the control of the study

    scope

  • 98

    gives the nature of the research process

    scope and delimitation

  • 99

    its is based in the theory and emperical evidence

    null hypothesis

  • 100

    expresses expected relationship between two or more variables

    null hypothesis