問題一覧
1
Soft Skils
Social Skills, Self-Management, Academic Soft Skills, Approaches to Learning
2
Taxonomy of Affective Domain
Receiving, Responding, Valuing, Organization, Characterization
3
concerned with getting, holding, and directing student’s attention. Can be assessed through interest inventories and can be rated using Likert scale.
Receiving
4
concerned with active participation of the learners by showing interest on what they are doing.
Responding
5
can be shown by completing the assigned work, active participation of students in class discussion…
Interest
6
the willingness to be perceived by the others as valuing certain ideas, materials, phenomenon, or behavior.
Valuing
7
can be shown on the general reaction to a series of questions that the teacher gets from the students.
Preference or Appreciation
8
concerned with the development of philosophy of life by bringing out the values of the students together to form a value system that will determine relationship among values and resolve conflicts.
Organization
9
can be shown by accepting responsibility for his behavior, understanding and accepting own strength and weaknesses…
Philosophy of Life
10
concerned with how the students act consistently with values internalized.
Characterization
11
can be illustrated by demonstrating self-reliance in working independently…
Lifestyle
12
Methods of Assessing Affective Domain:
Teacher Observation, Student Self-report, Peer Ratings
13
systematic record on the observation about the presence or absence of affective outcomes.
Teacher Observation
14
Two methods of teacher observation:
Unstructured Observation, Structured Observation
15
Allow students to express their feelings or attitudes.
Student Self-report
16
Examples under Self-report
Self-reflection, Interview Method
17
Two Methods of Student Self-Report:
Constructed-response format, Selected-response format
18
done using a completion item or an essay item.
Constructed-response format
19
least method in assessing affective learning outcomes; assessing or judging their classmate behavior.
Peer Rating
20
Errors in Assessing Performance-Based Assessment:
Halo Effect, Severity Error, Generosity Error
21
Giving high grades without thorough evaluation of the performance or output of the students even if it does not exceed the set standard.
Generosity Error
22
Giving low grades without thorough evaluation of the performance or output of the students even if it exceeds the set standard.
Severity Error