ログイン

gis lesson 1

gis lesson 1
26問 • 2年前
  • poo
  • 通報

    問題一覧

  • 1

    divides the range of attribute values into equal sized sub ranges, allowing one to specify the number of intervals while the algorithm determines where the breaks should be

    equal interval

  • 2

    emphasizes the amount of an attribute value relative to other values

    equal interval

  • 3

    best applied to familiar data ranges such as percentages and temperature

    equal interval

  • 4

    GOOD: presenting information to a non-technical audience easier to interpret especially for familiar values like percentages

    equal interval

  • 5

    DISADVANTAGE: values may cluster in the histogram, may have many features in one class and none in another

    equal interval

  • 6

    each class contains an equal number of features

    quantile

  • 7

    well suited to linearly (i.e. evenly) distributed data

    quantile

  • 8

    similar features can be placed in adjacent classes, or features with widely different values can be put in the same class

    quantile

  • 9

    distortion can be minimized by increasing the number of classes

    quantile

  • 10

    GOOD: emphasizing relative position (e.g. which countries are in the top 20% for income)

    quantile

  • 11

    DISADVANTAGE: features with similar values may end up in different classes, exaggerating their Differences reverse can also happen: wide range of values can end up in the same classes, minimizing differences

    quantile

  • 12

    classes are based on natural groupings inherent in the data

    natural breaks

  • 13

    identifies break points by picking the class breaks that best group similar values and maximizes differences between classes

    natural breaks

  • 14

    boundaries are set where there are relatively big jumps in the data values

    natural breaks

  • 15

    GOOD: mapping values that are not evenly distributed in the histogram

    natural breaks

  • 16

    DISADVANTAGE: class ranges are tailored to one data set, so difficult to compare maps can be difficult to choose optimum number of classes especially if data are evenly distributed

    natural breaks

  • 17

    creates class breaks based on class intervals that have geometric series

    geometric int

  • 18

    the algorithm minimizes the sum of squares of the number of elements in each class

    geometric int

  • 19

    ensures that each class range has approximately the same number of values with each class and the change between intervals is fairly consistent

    geometric int

  • 20

    GOOD: designed to accommodate continuous data creates a balance between highlighting changes in the middle values and the extreme values, thereby visually appealing and cartographically comprehensive

    geometric int

  • 21

    DISADVANTAGE: especially if data are evenly distributed

    geometric int

  • 22

    shows how much a feature’s attribute value varies from the mean

    standard dev

  • 23

    class breaks are created based on the calculated mean and the standard deviations from the mean

    standard dev

  • 24

    two-color ramp helps emphasize values above (shown in blue) and below (shown in red) the mean

    standard dev

  • 25

    GOOD: seeing which features are above or below an average value data has a normal distribution

    standard dev

  • 26

    DISADVANTAGE: map doesn’t show actual values, only how far values are from the mean very high or low values can skew the mean

    standard dev

  • gis lesson 2

    gis lesson 2

    poo · 47問 · 2年前

    gis lesson 2

    gis lesson 2

    47問 • 2年前
    poo

    nrc topic 6

    nrc topic 6

    poo · 26問 · 2年前

    nrc topic 6

    nrc topic 6

    26問 • 2年前
    poo

    gis lesson 3

    gis lesson 3

    poo · 27問 · 2年前

    gis lesson 3

    gis lesson 3

    27問 • 2年前
    poo

    gis lesson 4

    gis lesson 4

    poo · 40問 · 2年前

    gis lesson 4

    gis lesson 4

    40問 • 2年前
    poo

    fmh

    fmh

    poo · 5問 · 2年前

    fmh

    fmh

    5問 • 2年前
    poo

    tbm

    tbm

    poo · 36問 · 2年前

    tbm

    tbm

    36問 • 2年前
    poo

    ethics ch2

    ethics ch2

    poo · 44問 · 1年前

    ethics ch2

    ethics ch2

    44問 • 1年前
    poo

    ethics ch1.5-6

    ethics ch1.5-6

    poo · 19問 · 1年前

    ethics ch1.5-6

    ethics ch1.5-6

    19問 • 1年前
    poo

    ch1

    ch1

    poo · 16問 · 1年前

    ch1

    ch1

    16問 • 1年前
    poo

    ch1

    ch1

    poo · 28問 · 1年前

    ch1

    ch1

    28問 • 1年前
    poo

    topic 1

    topic 1

    poo · 7問 · 1年前

    topic 1

    topic 1

    7問 • 1年前
    poo

    問題一覧

  • 1

    divides the range of attribute values into equal sized sub ranges, allowing one to specify the number of intervals while the algorithm determines where the breaks should be

    equal interval

  • 2

    emphasizes the amount of an attribute value relative to other values

    equal interval

  • 3

    best applied to familiar data ranges such as percentages and temperature

    equal interval

  • 4

    GOOD: presenting information to a non-technical audience easier to interpret especially for familiar values like percentages

    equal interval

  • 5

    DISADVANTAGE: values may cluster in the histogram, may have many features in one class and none in another

    equal interval

  • 6

    each class contains an equal number of features

    quantile

  • 7

    well suited to linearly (i.e. evenly) distributed data

    quantile

  • 8

    similar features can be placed in adjacent classes, or features with widely different values can be put in the same class

    quantile

  • 9

    distortion can be minimized by increasing the number of classes

    quantile

  • 10

    GOOD: emphasizing relative position (e.g. which countries are in the top 20% for income)

    quantile

  • 11

    DISADVANTAGE: features with similar values may end up in different classes, exaggerating their Differences reverse can also happen: wide range of values can end up in the same classes, minimizing differences

    quantile

  • 12

    classes are based on natural groupings inherent in the data

    natural breaks

  • 13

    identifies break points by picking the class breaks that best group similar values and maximizes differences between classes

    natural breaks

  • 14

    boundaries are set where there are relatively big jumps in the data values

    natural breaks

  • 15

    GOOD: mapping values that are not evenly distributed in the histogram

    natural breaks

  • 16

    DISADVANTAGE: class ranges are tailored to one data set, so difficult to compare maps can be difficult to choose optimum number of classes especially if data are evenly distributed

    natural breaks

  • 17

    creates class breaks based on class intervals that have geometric series

    geometric int

  • 18

    the algorithm minimizes the sum of squares of the number of elements in each class

    geometric int

  • 19

    ensures that each class range has approximately the same number of values with each class and the change between intervals is fairly consistent

    geometric int

  • 20

    GOOD: designed to accommodate continuous data creates a balance between highlighting changes in the middle values and the extreme values, thereby visually appealing and cartographically comprehensive

    geometric int

  • 21

    DISADVANTAGE: especially if data are evenly distributed

    geometric int

  • 22

    shows how much a feature’s attribute value varies from the mean

    standard dev

  • 23

    class breaks are created based on the calculated mean and the standard deviations from the mean

    standard dev

  • 24

    two-color ramp helps emphasize values above (shown in blue) and below (shown in red) the mean

    standard dev

  • 25

    GOOD: seeing which features are above or below an average value data has a normal distribution

    standard dev

  • 26

    DISADVANTAGE: map doesn’t show actual values, only how far values are from the mean very high or low values can skew the mean

    standard dev